I don’t post very often in this blog (alas) and I have noticed sometimes people poke around on this site, presumably because they find it interesting. I’m gratified, but I want to make sure if individuals who are not clinical researchers are looking into scientific literature about probiotics (or any other health issue) that they are equipped with enough knowledge to understand what they are reading.

Here is one paper that will be useful: How to read a clinical trial paper . It’s by Shail M. Govani, and Peter D. R. Higgins, both from the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, MI.

As is the case with every microbiome paper I give links to in this site, I don’t actually know these people, but I’m confident that anyone wanting to learn more about how microbiome research (and probiotics) will benefit from giving the paper a quick read.

As for my personal Project: Cancer-Fighting Gut Bacteria, it is going on- I’ve finished a document that describes work on this project for potential funders, and I’ve also finished a more ambitious document that includes work designed to enhance sustainable agriculture (dealing with greenhouse gas emissions from soils and manure piles, and finding ways to remove insect pests while preserving pollinating species like honeybees).

It’s possible I might be able to work with Dr. Schiestl again in future- he says he would be pleased to work with me again- so if I go to UCLA and there are sufficient funds, I should be able to at least work on my cancer project. Finding partners for the other two projects is pretty easy, the largest question is finding funding.

The best thing about approaching these projects as if they were business projects is that I’ve come up with ideas for products based on the technology that could be developed- if I’m right about how all these systems work. Even if I’m right about one of the three, the intellectual property developed should be worth a fair bit of money to the right industrial partner. The potential return on investment is actually very high! So I am hopeful I can find a private funder who requires less red tape and will allow us to keep our intellectual property to ourselves (every time a grant is evaluated, a whole panel of people judge it and I doubt that every reviewer is able to keep from being influenced by what he or she is reading). It would be wonderful to be the first to claim patentable intellectual property regarding each of these projects.


I’ve been busy putting together something analogous to a business plan, only calling it a “project plan” to show to potential funders of Project: Cancer-Fighting Gut Bacteria. I’m pretty happy with how it’s shaping up. This week is all about this particular, and very important, project. Once I am finished I will share this with my UCLA collaborator and maybe a few others to get feedback and letters of support for the appendix.

The goal with this is to take the project plan to people more used to looking at business plans than science grants and see if it’s possible to fund the project via philanthropy.

I’ve also stumbled across a terrific plan for a project dealing with agricultural soil bacteria and greenhouse gas mitigation, where my involvement would be minimal- if I manage to find success with Project: Cancer-Fighting Gut Bacteria I’ll probably try this tactic to fund other projects.

Wish me luck!

Hello, readers- I’m currently on Day Two of an interesting (free!) videocast series from NIH on microbiome studies. You can find more information here.

In other news, I’ve written a hypothesis paper for my ideas stemming from my 2014 and subsequent work on Project: Cancer-Fighting Gut Bacteria, and I am both refining these ideas, and withdrawing the paper from publication (luckily, it was rejected for lack of data, which is amusing since it is a hypothesis paper, which by definition does not come bundled with much data! I am relieved, though, since this means I can continue on with my plans for this work). I’m not going to say much about my plans other than that I am seeking funding to test the hypothesis myself, probably at UCLA. Today’s sessions at the NIH meeting have been helpful in triggering new ideas, so I may add some new details to the experiments I had in mind.

Some additional news: there’s been a really interesting paper out last year which I only just came across, dealing with soil inoculants that limit greenhouse gas production in agricultural systems: paper here. This links to an idea I had earlier but had no resources to follow up on, and perhaps if my fundraising for my cancer project is successful, I can shunt some money toward work on nosZ+ soil or manure inoculants in North America.

So, at long last, after years of trying and failing to raise funds to fully test a hypothesis I developed on how bacteria in microbiomes might interact with their hosts, my colleague at UCLA and I have finally just submitted a hypothesis paper.  The model I had in mind to test was an intestinal bacterium and mouse or human cell lines, but the interaction mechanism could apply equally to bacteria and plants or fungi, and the hypothesis paper we submitted makes this clear. I really have no idea how it will be received, but my fingers are crossed.

There are lots of people to thank for this particular paper, as I’ve had valuable conversations with many researchers, and in 2014 the original work leading to this paper was partially funded by Project: Cancer-Fighting Gut Bacteria, a crowdsourcing effort funded by about a dozen people. I’m grateful to them all, as I am to Jonathan Agin, who penned an article describing how people were more outraged about fictional character Brian Griffin dying on the television show Family Guy than they were about actual human children dying of cancer. That article was a major inspiration for me to take the risk of starting the crowdsourcing project. I’m also grateful to Seth MacFarlane, who circulated Mr. Agin’s article on social media (else I would never have seen it), and, of course, to my late brother Fred, whose untimely death from cancer in 2003 was also a major source of inspiration for me.

Here is hoping the reviewers look upon our manuscript kindly.

Hello, readers! I’ve finished a draft of a hypothesis article, describing an idea that came out of the research started in 2014 with my UCLA colleague, Dr. Robert Schiestl. This work was partially crowdfunded (the majority of it I funded myself from a bank loan) and I called the crowdfunding effort Project: Cancer-Fighting Gut Bacteria.

The journal mSphere publishes hypothesis articles, and once I secure the names of three or more folks who would be willing to read the article with an open mind, I’ll format it for submission and send it along. I am hoping because it was not funded by a grant that they will waive page charges. It’s not as satisfying as it would have been to submit a journal article describing the experiments I actually want to do to start to test this hypothesis, but I hope that I’m able to inspire others to carry out this work, as well as find funding (still looking for appropriate grants) to see if we can do at least a bit of it ourselves.

Have a great day!

Greetings, readers!

With all the uncertainty about federal funds possibly freezing and potential issues with co-applying for an NIH grant with my UCLA colleague, I’ve been on the lookout for other potential sources of funding. We would not need as much as an R21 grant is capped at, substantially less, in fact, to do some additional preliminary studies- and the work, if successful, would make an advance that would in theory affect many more diseases and disorders, not just cancer.

I’ve found a few promising avenues and am awaiting instructions for how to apply. Real research is so much different from Hollywood movie research, where people are able to do a decade of work in under two hours. I rather wish things could be accelerated, but unless a kind philanthropist is willing to come out of the wings and offer somewhere around $75,000-$125,000 USD to my UCLA collaborator, I am afraid this work will have to stay in stasis while we continue to look for funding.

I am optimistic that these new smaller granting agencies will work out more satisfactorily than a NIH grant application would, though.

[UPDATE: NIH funding does not seem to be frozen for this fiscal year, so it is possible I might be successful with an R21 grant- I plan to approach a variety of labs in the LA area to see who might have time and interest in helping me apply for one, and who might be willing to host me in their lab for a couple of years. This is kind of a long shot, though.]

Hello readers! So I’m happy to report that in July on my vacation I managed to get quite a lot done on two major parts of the grant. We still need to come up with a budget, but the experimental plan and objectives are nailed down! I’m optimistic that we will make the deadline (ostensibly in October, but internal deadlines are sooner). Really all this needs is about one afternoon to put together a budget, then one or two days for someone to fill in all the different boxes and things in the online forms. This has to be done at UCLA, not by me (though I will help with the budget), but I am happy that everything is at a point where it can progress.

Speaking of progression, I am leaving my current full-time job soon and, after a vacation break (probably a lengthy one), going back to school to pick up a certificate in computer science. I’m lucky enough that my husband is willing to support me financially through all that. This means that I’ll have more free time and energy, though nothing can be done with this project until we get more experimental results, and that will require someone to do the work (I can’t afford to unless I am getting paid, and I have no immediate plans to move to Los Angeles to work at UCLA). I’ll be better able to help with the analysis of the data once I have my certificate, and so I’m looking forward to acting as collaborator/bioinformatician in the future, once funding has been achieved and experiments run.

I’ll also have more free time to survey the burgeoning literature for interesting microbiome studies. I have a number of interesting papers which I kept meaning to share for a long time and never quite got around to, and I hope to post a bit more often once I’m on my next vacation.

So, readers, I have fallen off the face of the Earth lately when it comes to maintaining this blog- it’s partly due to increased duties at work combined with illness (it’s a combination which pretty much guarantees the removal of all my spare energy), and it’s partly due to the fact that I’ve been devoting some energy to working on Project Cancer-Fighting Gut Bacteria.

Specifically, I’ve re-analyzed some data and made some new observations, and all this is going into an NIH R21 grant that I’m writing with my UCLA collaborator. The new planned work is, I think, better than what I had planned before with the team of people I had wanted to work with from not just UCLA, but Duke and Guelph as well. So the work is smaller in scope, in some ways, but should have an impact nevertheless if we manage to pull off the experimental work.

The next grant deadline that we plan to aim for is in the fall- so wish me luck. I’ll be working on this over my vacation in a couple of weeks.

Hello readers: I’ve come across an interesting article from my own home university, the University of Guelph! It’s entitled “Stress and the microbiome: linking glucocorticoids to bacterial community dynamics in wild red squirrels“, and it’s fascinating because (a) wild animals were used, responding naturally to their environments, and (b) it shows a direct link between levels of stress, as measured by faecal glucocorticoid hormones, and the microbiome, which controls so many aspects of one’s health. The paper comes out of the lab of Amy E. M. Newman.

The analysis is a little crude- the authors only looked at diversity of bacteria in faecal samples, not composition of bacteria to find which bacteria changed in abundance with stress- but it’s very clear that the overall diversity of bacteria in the microbiome of the squirrels analyzed in the study (via collection of faecal pellets) dropped when those pellets had higher levels of glucocorticoid hormones (which are an indicator of stress response).

What does this mean for you? Well, it’s clear from many studies that stress negatively impacts your health, and the alteration of the gut microbiome in response to stress probably happens in people as well as squirrels. This may be one more mechanism by which our psyche is connected to our physiological state via the gut-brain axis.

Hi everyone- so the interesting probiotic strain of Lactobacillus johnsonii (it has suppressive effects on lymphoma development in mice) that UCLA researcher Robert Schiestl is working with is being subjected to all sorts of studies. Dr. Schiestl himself wants to do some really interesting things with it, including human clinical trials, and I hope he finds the funds he needs to accomplish his fairly ambitious goals. I myself was trying to help him with this, and to also find funding to continue a project I had started in 2014. My project (Project: Cancer-Fighting Gut Bacteria) had the goal of figuring out one possible mechanism that this bacterium (and maybe other gut bacteria) might employ to affect human health. If I am right about the mechanism, it might be possible to design treatments that people who can’t tolerate probiotics, like chemotherapy patients who must avoid live bacteria, can take which might help them with some of the negative side-effects of chemotherapy treatments. Maybe. Even if I’m right, developing such treatments would take a long time, and of course the first step would be the experiments I and my collaborators were planning in the project.

I thought it might be possible to write an NIH R21 grant with the help of collaborators at Duke, the University of Guelph and with Dr. Schiestl’s help- but alas, there are three main impediments to this idea. The first is that I myself am not allowed to be PI on grants- my position simply does not allow this, and so in order for a grant to go forward, someone else has to be PI. Because this is a lot of work, I thought it might work if I volunteered to write the majority of the grant myself, and just get assistance with things like forms and submission deadlines- but unfortunately this situation isn’t working well with the long distances involved in this working group. The second impediment to my writing an R21 is that I am employed full-time as a researcher at the University of Guelph looking at environmental microbiology questions, and my employer is concerned that I’ll spend too much energy working on this project and not enough on her projects. This is a valid concern.  Thirdly, I am bipolar- and I find that if I try to push myself too hard and work too much, I break down. So I have to draw a line somewhere with how much of my spare time I can spend working.

So, the best solution to this problem is for me to find a position that allows me to focus on writing the grants I feel need to be written during my working days, and allows me to act as PI on those grants. This would solve a number of problems, and would also allow me to get credit for the ideas that are mine (a nice bonus). So until a situation comes along that allows me to be PI on the grant I’d need to write to fund it, Project: Cancer-Fighting Gut Bacteria is on ice.  This is a hard decision for me to make, since I have a deep personal interest in the project (my brother died of cancer in 2003, and loved ones of friends of mine have suffered through lymphoma chemotherapy treatments), and if I’m correct about the mechanism the finding would be quite important scientifically.  But I can’t afford to fund it myself, crowdfunding has not worked for me, and the only way I can write a grant and do it well is if I can focus on it properly- which means I need to be working as an adjunct professor, at the very least, and not simply a research associate.

I’m going to maintain this website, since it consistently gets a small number of hits and I hope the short pieces I write on probiotic bacteria will be useful to people seeking information. There’s a lot of hype and a lot of poorly researched articles out there- as I find interesting work I will continue to blog about it here.

Thanks for reading, and I hope you find something interesting on this site.